We've moved. Come and join the fun at scottandrewbird.com.

Traffic needed to support a forum?

Roman ForumAn interesting point was raised in a recent discussion on commenting - the level of traffic required for a site to satisfactorily create a forum. The forums which started this line of thought were the superb ones on Steve Pavlina's site, which contain a level of integration with the blog in several areas not always seen in such installations. This integration deepens his contact with the site's readers. How much traffic should a site have before launching forums?

home | previous entry / next entry

add to del.icio.us | digg it | technorati | blinklist | furl | reddit

See also:

Comments

1

Scott, you're officially an SOB! Contratulations.

If a blog has good, solid traffic, it seems to me that it constitutes a forum in itself.

2

Thanks Carolyn.

My current thinking is that a forum is intended to be a two-way process, whilst a blog can be. If the intention is to effectively use the commenting facilities, a bit of effort is required as well as the traffic.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

If you enjoyed this post, why not receive future posts via email.

Delivered by FeedBurner